The Moderator’s Paradox (a barber’s paraphrase)

Suppose there is an Internet Community with just one moderator; and that every person in the community keeps himself moderated: some by moderating themselves, some by obeying the (one and only) moderator.

It seems reasonable to imagine that the moderator obeys the following rule:

  • He moderates all and only those members of the community who do not moderate themselves.

Under this scenario, we can ask the following question:

- Does the moderator moderate himself?

Asking this, however, we discover that the situation presented is in fact impossible:

  • If the moderator does not moderate himself, he must abide by the rule and moderate himself.

  • If he does moderate himself, according to the rule he will not moderate himself.

:)

2 Responses to “The Moderator’s Paradox (a barber’s paraphrase)”

  1. Moderations are the masks of/for moderators, their “rules” conceal their personalities. His/their rules replace the lack of a language for unmoderated relations. The undiscussed moderator’s idealisms hide his fear of interhuman relations. As it happened at a clan. I think …

    (if somebody will ask if i relate the function of undiscussed moderation with that of the clan like mafia, well, yeees