
Semantic Hacker is a cool blog (and site) about the Semantic Web. I’ve placed them in my Web 3.0 blogroll today. They are offering an API (Application Programming Interface in geek-lingo) that can be integrated in Semantic Web applications using «Concept-Spaces», based on weighted keywords.
However, an attempt I made to run their on-line test proved immediately and conclusively that their innovative API badly needs (Prolog-based?) Natural Language methods (NLP) of parsing and understanding human text. Without such methods, I’m afraid that the Semantic Hacker’s API… sucks! (Although this failure is occasional; most of the time the API test being quite successful). You can check this out by looking at the text I submitted to their on-line test, together with their (rather off-topic) results (copied and pasted from their test-form page):
Input Text Cut and paste your own text into this area.
Suppose there is an Internet Community with just one moderator; and that every person in the community keeps himself moderated: some by moderating themselves, some by obeying the (one and only) moderator. It seems reasonable to imagine that the moderator obeys the following rule: He moderates all and only those members of the community who do not moderate themselves. Under this scenario, we can ask the following question: Does the moderator moderate himself?
Simplified Semantic Signature®
…/EverQuest_Games/EverQuest/Server_Specific 38…/Space_Combat/Star_Wars_Games/Star_Wars_Galaxies/Clans_and_Guilds 26Society/Philosophy/Chats_and_Forums 24Home/Family/Pregnancy/Chats_and_Forums24Arts/Literature/Authors/Blake,_William 23
Related Wikipedia Articles
1.) Moderate2.) Quarterdeck6.) Edward Grim8.) Jolly Cola9.) Welton Becket10.) Becket (film)(end of test-results copied-&-pasted from Semantic Hacker)
Well, one can easily verify that… absolutely NONE of these results have any connection to the original text submitted: It was a text about moderation (aka private censorship), paraphrasing the well-known Logic Paradox (originally by Bertrand Russell) called «The barber’s paradox», as explained in my blog-post «The Moderator’s Paradox» (a barber’s paraphrase).
- Assembly Language is necessary highly beneficial because of the huge amount of Data that needs to be processed: The Entirety of the Web, in fact. Even the fastest CPUs and the fastest programs are simply not enough !
- PROLOG (and Natural Language Programming – NLP) is also (even more) necessary, for the reasons explained previously (and elsewhere).
- Use of PROLOG turbo-enhanced with Pure Assembly Language is my personal choice for most programming, in the last 18 years or so (e.g. as in http://omadeon.com/alc)
.
Χρόνια Πολλά
Νάσαι καλά Τάσο!
Hi,
are you interested in trying out Zemanta API in private beta?
please mail me.
(couldn’t find your email, to write you directly, sorry)
bye
andraz
Hi, I am already using Zemanta, as you know!
So I’d be very interested to try out the API in private beta!
My e-mail is
omadeon @ hotmail.com
Thanx